- Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 full#
- Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 software#
- Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 professional#
Since I thought my final EPUBs are much too clean, I grabbed an EPUB that was in the process of being cleaned from DOCX. like some those we discussed in the "Amazon objecting to page breaks" thread. It seems like these checks don't match what you can get dinged for with KQNs though. since Calibre's External Links Checker goes on a mass spree. but gave up after it ran for quite a while. Currently, this takes you to the classic editor. You will also see an Edit Book Details button.
Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 full#
To learn more, see section "External Link Guidelines" in Kindle Publishing Guidelines, or refer to the eBook Manuscript Formatting Guide on Amazon KDP if your book is in Microsoft Word formatīut it seems like it may reach out to a handful (?) of external URLs at a time. After you click the thumbnail (really, the second time you click on a thumbnail), you will see slightly more information: the full title, the review tally (finally), and a little product information. OTHER than that, and line-heights, however (and making it appear that images will be vertically resized, to fit on a "page" or screen, if there's also text that's flowed to that screen, which doesn't happen with real devices), Previewer is reasonably accurate.Your book has an external link that does not work: Anything over 50%, is always rendered at 100%, no matter what lies Previewer tells you. Because the PPW family will render it at 100%. That is, if you have an image that you need to be, let's say, 52% of the width of the screen, you're HOSED.
Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 software#
To this day, the bloody PPW family of devices and the rendering software seems to have a bug. oh YES INDEEDY, you will see a huge difference in image size. IF you are testing your book on a Paperwhite, or PPW family device, like Voyage, Oasis, etc. But if that's not relevant to understanding the previewer discrepancies, please ignore.) (If it makes a difference, the issue where I noticed the discrepancy is image size. I'm using Kindle Previewer 3 and Kindle 1.25.2 on a Mac.īoth appear to be up to date (I just downloaded Previewer yesterday). Or is each maybe useful in a different way (and if so, what is each program's strong point?)? Or, should I keep fiddling until I get happy results in both?
So I'm wondering, should I even be using Kindle Previewer?
Sometimes even when something seems to work in Kindle Previewer, it's still problematic in Kindle. I'm editing an azw3 file in Calibre and looking at the results in Kindle Previewer and Kindle.
Does kindle previewer accurately preview images 2015 professional#
Professional e-book formatters will also test the book in a variety of formats using multiple devices/apps to get at least an acceptable quality of rendering on all of them. For books with simple formatting the results shown by the Kindle Previewer are pretty close to what readers with newer Kindle devices will see. Publishers mostly provide either EPUB or DOCX to Amazon and Amazon then produces the various Kindle formats from that. Amazon does not accept that format from publishers. If you are instead producing a book for sale on Amazon then you are taking a wrong approach by editing an AZW3 file. If you are producing a book for personal reading on your own devices then I suggest making it look good there and not worrying about how the Kindle Previewer shows it. Use of unsupported features is more likely to result in a book that renders inconsistently. See the Amazon Kindle Publishing Guidelines for information about what HTML/CSS is supported. There are also differences between renderers for the same format across different apps and devices. Amazon supports multiple Kindle formats (mainly MOBI7, KF8, and KFX) and there are significant differences in how these are rendered. There is no one true way that a book will be rendered.
0 kommentar(er)
